Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

Maserati Khamsin

Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1973

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
Maserati Khamsin (1973)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A)Khamsin
Horsepower110 hp320 hp
Torque96 lb-ft332 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc4,930 cc
0-60 mph10.2 sec6.8 sec
Top Speed115 mph155 mph
¼ Mile17.5 sec15.0 sec
Weight2,072 lbs3,814 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,550 mm
Length4,140 mm4,550 mm
Units Produced1,519430
Original MSRP$28,500
Value (Excellent)$350,000$250,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

The 1973 Maserati Khamsin emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1973 Maserati Khamsin is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Italy. The 1973 Maserati Khamsin holds a clear advantage in raw power with 320 hp compared to 110 hp, a 210-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the Maserati Khamsin relies on a V8 DOHC with 4,930 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1973 Maserati Khamsin edges ahead at 6.8 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1742 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 430 units built, the 1973 Maserati Khamsin is considerably scarcer than the Mazda Cosmo Sport's 1,519 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.