USA vs USA — 1967 vs 1964
| Mustang Fastback GT | Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 271 hp |
| Torque | 312 lb-ft | 314 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 121 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,900 lbs | 2,678 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,699 mm | 4,613 mm |
| Units Produced | 472,121 | 7,273 |
| Original MSRP | $2,692 | $2,911 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $150,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 8/10 |
The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Ford Mustang Fastback GT counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Ford Mustang from 1967 to 1964 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Ford. The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance holds a clear advantage in raw power with 271 hp compared to 225 hp, a 46-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Ford Mustang relies on a V8 OHV (solid lifter, high-performance) with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 7.5 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 222 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 7,273 units built, the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance is considerably scarcer than the Ford Mustang's 472,121 examples.