Germany vs USA — 2000 vs 2016
| M5 E39 | ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 394 hp | 464 hp |
| Torque | 369 lb-ft | 445 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,941 cc | 3,564 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8 sec | 3.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 189 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 12.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,956 lbs | 3,769 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,830 mm | 2,775 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,680 mm |
| Units Produced | 20,482 | — |
| Original MSRP | $69,400 | $61,460 |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 5/10 |
The 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 2000 BMW M5 E39 counters with stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 2000 BMW M5 E39 against the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Germany versus USA. The 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 464 hp compared to 394 hp, a 70-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the BMW M5 uses a V8 DOHC 32V (S62) displacing 4,941 cc, while the Cadillac ATS-V relies on a V6 DOHC Twin-Turbo (LF4) with 3,564 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 edges ahead at 3.8 seconds versus 4.8 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.