Jaguar E-Type

vs

Ferrari 365 GT 2+2

UK vs Italy — 1961 vs 1969

Jaguar E-Type (1961)
Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 (1969)
Specifications
E-Type Series I 4.2 Coupe365 GT 2+2
Horsepower265 hp320 hp
Torque283 lb-ft318 lb-ft
Engine Size4,235 cc4,390 cc
0-60 mph7.0 sec7.3 sec
Top Speed150 mph152 mph
¼ Mile15.0 sec15.2 sec
Weight2,701 lbs3,748 lbs
Wheelbase2,438 mm2,650 mm
Length4,445 mm4,900 mm
Units Produced72,507800
Original MSRP$5,595$21,900
Value (Excellent)$350,000$175,000
Collectibility10/107/10
Rarity5/106/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1961 Jaguar E-Type Series I 4.2 Coupe excels in quicker acceleration, lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1969 Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 stands out for more power, higher top speed, greater rarity. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1961 Jaguar E-Type Series I 4.2 Coupe against the 1969 Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — UK versus Italy. The 1969 Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 320 hp compared to 265 hp, a 55-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Jaguar E-Type uses a Inline-6 DOHC (XK) displacing 4,235 cc, while the Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 relies on a V12 SOHC with 4,390 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1961 Jaguar E-Type Series I 4.2 Coupe edges ahead at 7.0 seconds versus 7.3 seconds. The Jaguar E-Type carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1047 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 800 units built, the 1969 Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 is considerably scarcer than the Jaguar E-Type's 72,507 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1961 Jaguar E-Type Series I 4.2 Coupe rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.