Holden Commodore VT

vs

Holden EH

Australia vs Australia — 1997 vs 1963

Holden Commodore VT (1997)
Holden EH (1963)
Specifications
Commodore VT HSV GTSEH Premier
Horsepower300 hp115 hp
Torque339 lb-ft165 lb-ft
Engine Size5,665 cc2,932 cc
0-60 mph5.5 sec14.0 sec
Top Speed162 mph94 mph
¼ Mile13.5 sec19.5 sec
Weight3,660 lbs2,469 lbs
Wheelbase2,789 mm2,642 mm
Length4,912 mm4,481 mm
Units Produced256,902
Value (Excellent)$70,000$60,000
Collectibility7/107/10
Rarity6/104/10
The Verdict

This matchup is remarkably close. The 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1963 Holden EH Premier counters with lighter weight, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.

Overview

Within the Holden stable, the 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS and 1963 Holden EH Premier represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Holden badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 115 hp, a 185-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore VT uses a V8 OHV LS1 displacing 5,665 cc, while the Holden EH relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 2,932 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS edges ahead at 5.5 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. The Holden EH carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1191 lbs lighter. Both cars have earned their place in automotive history and continue to captivate enthusiasts around the world.