Italy vs Italy — 1963 vs 1967
| 2500 GT Allemano Coupe | Mistral Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 245 hp | 255 hp |
| Torque | 188 lb-ft | 239 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,467 cc | 4,014 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 7.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 15.3 sec |
| Weight | 2,072 lbs | 3,042 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,350 mm | 2,400 mm |
| Length | 4,090 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Units Produced | 12 | 125 |
| Original MSRP | — | $13,200 |
| Value (Excellent) | $1,500,000 | $750,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 9/10 |
On balance, the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. However, the 1967 Maserati Mistral Spyder counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe for outright capability, or the 1967 Maserati Mistral Spyder for a more distinctive ownership experience.
In the world of Grand Tourer cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe versus the 1967 Maserati Mistral Spyder. Both hail from Muscle era and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe producing 245 hp and the 1967 Maserati Mistral Spyder delivering 255 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the ATS 2500 GT uses a V8 DOHC displacing 2,467 cc, while the Maserati Mistral Spyder relies on a Inline-6 DOHC with 4,014 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 7.2 seconds. The ATS 2500 GT carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 970 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 12 units built, the 1963 ATS 2500 GT Allemano Coupe is considerably scarcer than the Maserati Mistral Spyder's 125 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.