Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 1963
| Commodore VE SS-V | EH Premier | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 362 hp | 115 hp |
| Torque | 391 lb-ft | 165 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,967 cc | 2,932 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 94 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 19.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,827 lbs | 2,469 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,915 mm | 2,642 mm |
| Length | 4,916 mm | 4,481 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 256,902 |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $60,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 4/10 |
On balance, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1963 Holden EH Premier counters with lighter weight, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V for outright capability, or the 1963 Holden EH Premier for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Holden has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V with the 1963 Holden EH Premier highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V holds a clear advantage in raw power with 362 hp compared to 115 hp, a 247-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 5,967 cc, while the Holden EH relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 2,932 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V edges ahead at 5.1 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. The Holden EH carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1358 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.