Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1995
| Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 142 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.3 sec | 13.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,778 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
On balance, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A for outright capability, or the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1995 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A producing 280 hp and the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III delivering 270 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.