Japan vs Japan — 1995 vs 1994
| Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) | FTO GPX Mivec | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 220 lb-ft | 148 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,998 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,230 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,395 mm | 4,320 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 65,000 |
| Original MSRP | $23,999 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 7/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) offers quicker acceleration, while the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Mitsubishi stable, the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Mitsubishi badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) producing 210 hp and the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec delivering 200 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Eclipse uses a Inline-4 DOHC Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi FTO relies on a V6 DOHC MIVEC with 1,998 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) edges ahead at 6.1 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Mitsubishi FTO carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 651 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.