Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1992
| Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A | Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 247 hp | 250 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.9 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,579 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $120,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 7/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A offers stronger collectibility, while the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) counters with quicker acceleration, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A producing 247 hp and the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) delivering 250 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) edges ahead at 5.3 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. Both cars have earned their place in automotive history and continue to captivate enthusiasts around the world.