Germany vs Japan — 1992 vs 1994
| Calibra Turbo 4x4 | FTO GPX Mivec | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 207 lb-ft | 148 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,998 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.2 sec | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,109 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,488 mm | 4,320 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,000 | 65,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $30,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1992 Opel Calibra Turbo 4x4 excels in higher top speed, greater rarity, while the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec stands out for quicker acceleration, lighter weight, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Putting the 1992 Opel Calibra Turbo 4x4 against the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Germany versus Japan. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Opel Calibra Turbo 4x4 producing 204 hp and the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec delivering 200 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Opel Calibra uses a Inline-4 Turbocharged displacing 1,998 cc, while the Mitsubishi FTO relies on a V6 DOHC MIVEC with 1,998 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 6.8 seconds. The Mitsubishi FTO carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 530 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 12,000 units built, the 1992 Opel Calibra Turbo 4x4 is considerably scarcer than the Mitsubishi FTO's 65,000 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.