Rolls-Royce Cullinan

vs

Land Rover Range Rover

UK vs UK — 2018 vs 2013

Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2018)
Land Rover Range Rover (2013)
Specifications
Cullinan Black BadgeRange Rover SVAutobiography L405
Horsepower600 hp565 hp
Torque664 lb-ft516 lb-ft
Engine Size6,749 cc5,000 cc
0-60 mph4.8 sec5.0 sec
Top Speed155 mph140 mph
¼ Mile13.0 sec13.2 sec
Weight6,067 lbs5,577 lbs
Wheelbase3,295 mm3,120 mm
Length5,341 mm5,200 mm
Original MSRP$382,000$210,000
Value (Excellent)$500,000$170,000
Collectibility5/105/10
Rarity4/105/10
The Verdict

It's a closely fought contest. The 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Black Badge brings quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405 answers with lighter weight, better value. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.

Overview

In the world of Ultra-Luxury SUV cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Black Badge versus the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405. Both hail from Modern classic and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. The 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Black Badge holds a clear advantage in raw power with 600 hp compared to 565 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan uses a V12 Twin-Turbo displacing 6,749 cc, while the Land Rover Range Rover relies on a V8 Supercharged with 5,000 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Black Badge edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. The Land Rover Range Rover carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 490 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Black Badge commands a significant premium over the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.