Toyota Celica GT-Four

vs

Toyota Aristo

Japan vs Japan — 1986 vs 1991

Toyota Celica GT-Four (1986)
Toyota Aristo (1991)
Specifications
Celica GT-Four ST205 WRCAristo V300 Twin Turbo
Horsepower255 hp280 hp
Torque228 lb-ft333 lb-ft
Engine Size1,998 cc2,997 cc
0-60 mph5.4 sec5.0 sec
Top Speed149 mph155 mph
¼ Mile13.9 sec13.2 sec
Weight3,064 lbs3,594 lbs
Wheelbase2,535 mm2,800 mm
Length4,420 mm4,805 mm
Units Produced2,500
Value (Excellent)$85,000$40,000
Collectibility8/107/10
Rarity7/106/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1986 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205 WRC excels in lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1991 Toyota Aristo V300 Twin Turbo stands out for quicker acceleration, higher top speed, better value. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

The 1986 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205 WRC and 1991 Toyota Aristo V300 Twin Turbo share a manufacturer in Toyota, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Toyota brand. The 1991 Toyota Aristo V300 Twin Turbo holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 255 hp, a 25-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Toyota Celica GT-Four uses a Inline-4 DOHC Turbocharged displacing 1,998 cc, while the Toyota Aristo relies on a Inline-6 DOHC Twin-Turbocharged with 2,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1991 Toyota Aristo V300 Twin Turbo edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 5.4 seconds. The Toyota Celica GT-Four carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 530 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.