USA vs USA — 1964 vs 1966
| Comet Cyclone CJ 428 | Charger Fastback 383 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 335 hp | 325 hp |
| Torque | 440 lb-ft | 410 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,014 cc | 6,276 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.1 sec | 14.9 sec |
| Weight | 3,502 lbs | 3,600 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,921 mm | 2,997 mm |
| Length | 5,131 mm | 5,257 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 37,344 |
| Original MSRP | $3,224 | $3,122 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $110,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 brings quicker acceleration to the table, and the 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383 answers with stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
In the world of Muscle Car cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 versus the 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383. Both hail from Muscle era and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 producing 335 hp and the 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383 delivering 325 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 edges ahead at 6.2 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.