USA vs USA — 1969 vs 1970
| Camaro Z/28 | AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 290 hp | 290 hp |
| Torque | 290 lb-ft | 340 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,949 cc | 5,572 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7 sec | 5.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 125 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,150 lbs | 3,400 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,724 mm | 4,871 mm |
| Units Produced | 19,014 | 2,724 |
| Original MSRP | $3,056 | $3,563 |
| Value (Excellent) | $175,000 | $180,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 excels in higher top speed, lighter weight, while the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack stands out for quicker acceleration, greater rarity. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Among Pony Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 and 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 producing 290 hp and the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack delivering 290 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV (DZ 302, high-revving small-block) displacing 4,949 cc, while the Plymouth AAR 'Cuda relies on a V8 OHV (340 Six Pack) with 5,572 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.7 seconds. The Chevrolet Camaro carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 250 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 2,724 units built, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack is considerably scarcer than the Chevrolet Camaro's 19,014 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.