Australia vs Australia — 1997 vs 2001
| Commodore VT HSV GTS | Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 457 hp |
| Torque | 339 lb-ft | 420 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,665 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5 sec | 4.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 162 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,660 lbs | 4,001 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 3,048 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 5,055 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $100,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS excels in higher top speed, lighter weight, while the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS and 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 share a manufacturer in Holden, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Holden brand. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 457 hp compared to 300 hp, a 157-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore VT uses a V8 OHV LS1 displacing 5,665 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 5.5 seconds. The Holden Commodore VT carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 341 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.