Germany vs Germany — 1968 vs 1986
| 2002 Turbo | M3 E30 Sport Evolution | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 170 hp | 215 hp |
| Torque | 181 lb-ft | 177 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,990 cc | 2,302 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 154 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.1 sec | 14.7 sec |
| Weight | 2,381 lbs | 2,645 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,562 mm |
| Length | 4,230 mm | 4,360 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,672 | 17,970 |
| Original MSRP | $6,480 | $34,950 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $200,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo excels in lighter weight, greater rarity, while the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo and 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution share a manufacturer in BMW, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the BMW brand. The 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution holds a clear advantage in raw power with 215 hp compared to 170 hp, a 45-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the BMW 2002 uses a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged displacing 1,990 cc, while the BMW M3 relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V with 2,302 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 6.9 seconds. The BMW 2002 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 264 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,672 units built, the 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo is considerably scarcer than the BMW M3's 17,970 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.