USA vs Australia — 1962 vs 1968
| Nova SS | Falcon GT-HO Phase III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 360 lb-ft | 360 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,736 cc | 5,763 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 125 mph | 145 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 14.4 sec |
| Weight | 3,050 lbs | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,819 mm |
| Length | 4,648 mm | 4,908 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 300 |
| Original MSRP | $2,540 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $65,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 10/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1962 Chevrolet Nova SS offers stronger collectibility, better value, while the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III counters with quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
When USA engineering meets Australia craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1962 Chevrolet Nova SS and 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1962 Chevrolet Nova SS producing 300 hp and the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III delivering 300 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Nova uses a V8 OHV (small-block) displacing 5,736 cc, while the Ford Falcon GT-HO relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,763 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1962 Chevrolet Nova SS, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1962 Chevrolet Nova SS rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.