Australia vs Australia — 1948 vs 1978
| 48-215 FX | Commodore VL Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 60 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 105 lb-ft | 251 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,171 cc | 2,960 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 7.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 80 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 15.1 sec |
| Weight | 2,251 lbs | 2,866 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,642 mm | 2,668 mm |
| Length | 4,420 mm | 4,712 mm |
| Units Produced | 120,402 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $60,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1948 Holden 48-215 FX offers lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1978 Holden Commodore VL Turbo counters with more power, higher top speed. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Holden stable, the 1948 Holden 48-215 FX and 1978 Holden Commodore VL Turbo represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Holden badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1978 Holden Commodore VL Turbo holds a clear advantage in raw power with 204 hp compared to 60 hp, a 144-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden 48-215 uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,171 cc, while the Holden Commodore VL relies on a Inline-6 Turbo SOHC 12V with 2,960 cc. The 1978 Holden Commodore VL Turbo claims a higher top speed at 143 mph compared to 80 mph. The Holden 48-215 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 615 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.