Germany vs Germany β 1986 vs 1968
| M3 E30 Sport Evolution | E9 3.0 CS Coupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 215 hp | 180 hp |
| Torque | 177 lb-ft | 192 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,302 cc | 2,985 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 154 mph | 130 mph |
| ΒΌ Mile | 14.7 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,645 lbs | 2,987 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,562 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,360 mm | 4,680 mm |
| Units Produced | 17,970 | 11,063 |
| Original MSRP | $34,950 | $9,195 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $125,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 7/10 |
On balance, the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution for outright capability, or the 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe for a more distinctive ownership experience.
BMW has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution with the 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution holds a clear advantage in raw power with 215 hp compared to 180 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the BMW M3 uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 2,302 cc, while the BMW E9 3.0 CS relies on a Inline-6 SOHC with 2,985 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1986 BMW M3 E30 Sport Evolution edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. The BMW M3 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 342 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.