France vs France — 1962 vs 1984
| Caravelle 1100S Convertible | 25 V6 Turbo Baccara | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 55 hp | 205 hp |
| Torque | 61 lb-ft | 229 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,108 cc | 2,458 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 17.0 sec | 7.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 90 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 20.5 sec | 15.8 sec |
| Weight | 1,830 lbs | 3,042 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,270 mm | 2,720 mm |
| Length | 4,280 mm | 4,620 mm |
| Units Produced | 117,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | $2,100 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $18,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
The 1984 Renault 25 V6 Turbo Baccara emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Renault stable, the 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible and 1984 Renault 25 V6 Turbo Baccara represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Renault badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1984 Renault 25 V6 Turbo Baccara holds a clear advantage in raw power with 205 hp compared to 55 hp, a 150-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Caravelle uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,108 cc, while the Renault 25 relies on a V6 OHV Turbo with 2,458 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1984 Renault 25 V6 Turbo Baccara edges ahead at 7.5 seconds versus 17.0 seconds. The Renault Caravelle carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1212 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible commands a significant premium over the 1984 Renault 25 V6 Turbo Baccara, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.