Japan vs Japan — 1998 vs 1983
| Accord Euro R CL1 | City Turbo II Bulldog | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 220 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 163 lb-ft | 118 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,157 cc | 1,231 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 8.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,888 lbs | 1,620 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,220 mm |
| Length | 4,590 mm | 3,380 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $30,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1998 Honda Accord Euro R CL1 brings more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog answers with lighter weight, stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Honda has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1998 Honda Accord Euro R CL1 with the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1998 Honda Accord Euro R CL1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 220 hp compared to 110 hp, a 110-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Honda Accord uses a Inline-4 DOHC VTEC displacing 2,157 cc, while the Honda City Turbo II relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged Intercooled with 1,231 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1998 Honda Accord Euro R CL1 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 8.6 seconds. The Honda City Turbo II carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1268 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.