Australia vs Australia — 1968 vs 1972
| Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II | Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 350 lb-ft | 380 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,752 cc | 5,752 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.4 sec | 14.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,208 lbs | 3,483 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,819 mm |
| Length | 4,840 mm | 4,858 mm |
| Units Produced | 400 | 0 |
| Value (Excellent) | $800,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 10/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1968 Ford Australia Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II offers quicker acceleration, lighter weight, better value, while the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV counters with higher top speed, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Ford Australia Falcon GT XW lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1968 Ford Australia Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II with the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV reveals how Ford Australia refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1968 Ford Australia Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II producing 300 hp and the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV delivering 300 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Ford Australia Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Ford Australia Falcon GT XW carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 275 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV commands a significant premium over the 1968 Ford Australia Falcon GT XW GTHO Phase II, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.