Nissan Skyline 2000GT

vs

Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1

Japan vs Australia β€” 1968 vs 1972

Nissan Skyline 2000GT (1968)
Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 (1972)
Specifications
Skyline 2000GT C10LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst
Horsepower130 hp186 hp
Torque127 lb-ft207 lb-ft
Engine Size1,998 cc3,310 cc
0-60 mph9.5 sec8.0 sec
Top Speed118 mph124 mph
ΒΌ Mile16.8 sec15.8 sec
Weight2,370 lbs2,348 lbs
Wheelbase2,640 mm2,540 mm
Length4,330 mm4,330 mm
Value (Excellent)$90,000$350,000
Collectibility7/109/10
Rarity7/108/10
The Verdict

Numbers favor the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1968 Nissan Skyline 2000GT C10 offers better value, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.

Overview

The rivalry between Japan and Australia automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1968 Nissan Skyline 2000GT C10 versus 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst holds a clear advantage in raw power with 186 hp compared to 130 hp, a 56-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Nissan Skyline 2000GT uses a Inline-6 SOHC displacing 1,998 cc, while the Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 3,310 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst edges ahead at 8.0 seconds versus 9.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst commands a significant premium over the 1968 Nissan Skyline 2000GT C10, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.