France vs France — 1980 vs 2001
| 5 Turbo Turbo 2 | Clio V6 Phase 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 160 hp | 230 hp |
| Torque | 155 lb-ft | 221 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,397 cc | 2,946 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 124 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.6 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,139 lbs | 2,943 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,430 mm | 2,430 mm |
| Length | 3,665 mm | 3,810 mm |
| Units Produced | 4,987 | 1,513 |
| Value (Excellent) | $250,000 | $100,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Numbers favor the 2001 Renault Clio V6 Phase 1 with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1980 Renault 5 Turbo Turbo 2 offers lighter weight, stronger collectibility, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
Renault has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1980 Renault 5 Turbo Turbo 2 with the 2001 Renault Clio V6 Phase 1 highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2001 Renault Clio V6 Phase 1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 230 hp compared to 160 hp, a 70-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault 5 Turbo uses a Inline-4 Turbo Cléon-Fonte displacing 1,397 cc, while the Renault Clio V6 relies on a V6 DOHC 24V with 2,946 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Renault Clio V6 Phase 1 edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. The Renault 5 Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 804 lbs lighter. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.