Germany vs Germany — 1968 vs 1968
| 2002 Turbo | E9 3.0 CS Coupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 170 hp | 180 hp |
| Torque | 181 lb-ft | 192 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,990 cc | 2,985 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.1 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,381 lbs | 2,987 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,230 mm | 4,680 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,672 | 11,063 |
| Original MSRP | $6,480 | $9,195 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $125,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
The 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. That said, the 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value BMW heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Within the BMW stable, the 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo and 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the BMW badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo producing 170 hp and the 1968 BMW E9 3.0 CS Coupe delivering 180 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the BMW 2002 uses a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged displacing 1,990 cc, while the BMW E9 3.0 CS relies on a Inline-6 SOHC with 2,985 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo edges ahead at 6.9 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. The BMW 2002 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 606 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,672 units built, the 1968 BMW 2002 Turbo is considerably scarcer than the BMW E9 3.0 CS's 11,063 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.