Holden Commodore

vs

Ford Mustang

Australia vs USA — 2006 vs 2012

Holden Commodore (2006)
Ford Mustang (2012)
Specifications
Commodore HSV GTS-R W1Mustang Shelby GT500
Horsepower636 hp662 hp
Torque601 lb-ft631 lb-ft
Engine Size6,162 cc5,812 cc
0-60 mph3.9 sec3.5 sec
Top Speed193 mph202 mph
¼ Mile11.9 sec11.6 sec
Wheelbase2,915 mm2,720 mm
Length4,936 mm4,825 mm
Units Produced300
Value (Excellent)$250,000$75,000
Collectibility5/105/10
Rarity9/104/10
The Verdict

The 2012 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, better value. The 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Putting the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 against the 2012 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Australia versus USA. The 2012 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 662 hp compared to 636 hp, a 26-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 Supercharged OHV 16V displacing 6,162 cc, while the Ford Mustang relies on a V8 DOHC 32V Supercharged with 5,812 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2012 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 edges ahead at 3.5 seconds versus 3.9 seconds. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 commands a significant premium over the 2012 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.