Japan vs Japan — 2002 vs 1983
| Accord Euro R CL7 | City Turbo II Bulldog | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 220 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 152 lb-ft | 118 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,231 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3 sec | 8.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 146 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,932 lbs | 1,620 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,220 mm |
| Length | 4,665 mm | 3,380 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
On balance, the 2002 Honda Accord Euro R CL7 makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog counters with lighter weight, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2002 Honda Accord Euro R CL7 for outright capability, or the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Honda has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 2002 Honda Accord Euro R CL7 with the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2002 Honda Accord Euro R CL7 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 220 hp compared to 110 hp, a 110-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Honda Accord Euro R uses a Inline-4 DOHC i-VTEC displacing 1,998 cc, while the Honda City Turbo II relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged Intercooled with 1,231 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Honda Accord Euro R CL7 edges ahead at 6.3 seconds versus 8.6 seconds. The Honda City Turbo II carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1312 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.