France vs France — 1969 vs 1970
| SM Injection | SM Injection | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 180 hp | 170 hp |
| Torque | 171 lb-ft | 167 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,670 cc | 2,670 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 142 mph | 137 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.5 sec | 16.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,197 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,950 mm | 2,900 mm |
| Length | 4,890 mm | 4,890 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,920 | 12,920 |
| Original MSRP | — | $11,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $130,000 | $150,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1969 Citroën SM Injection offers higher top speed, while the 1970 Citroen SM Injection counters with quicker acceleration, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Citroën SM lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1969 Citroën SM Injection with the 1970 Citroen SM Injection reveals how Citroën refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1969 Citroën SM Injection producing 180 hp and the 1970 Citroen SM Injection delivering 170 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Citroën SM uses a V6 DOHC 24V displacing 2,670 cc, while the Citroen SM relies on a V6 DOHC Maserati with 2,670 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Citroen SM Injection edges ahead at 8.5 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1970 Citroen SM Injection rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.