Studebaker Lark

vs

Nissan Bluebird 510

USA vs Japan — 1962 vs 1968

Studebaker Lark (1962)
Nissan Bluebird 510 (1968)
Specifications
Lark Daytona ConvertibleBluebird 510 SSS
Horsepower225 hp109 hp
Torque280 lb-ft105 lb-ft
Engine Size4,736 cc1,595 cc
0-60 mph9.5 sec10.5 sec
Top Speed115 mph109 mph
¼ Mile17.0 sec17.5 sec
Weight3,049 lbs2,072 lbs
Wheelbase2,794 mm2,420 mm
Length4,775 mm4,100 mm
Units Produced3,602
Original MSRP$2,814$2,100
Value (Excellent)$45,000$55,000
Collectibility6/107/10
Rarity7/107/10
The Verdict

This matchup is remarkably close. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1968 Nissan Bluebird 510 SSS counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.

Overview

When USA engineering meets Japan craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible and 1968 Nissan Bluebird 510 SSS embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible holds a clear advantage in raw power with 225 hp compared to 109 hp, a 116-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Studebaker Lark uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Nissan Bluebird 510 relies on a Inline-4 SOHC (L16) with 1,595 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible edges ahead at 9.5 seconds versus 10.5 seconds. The Nissan Bluebird 510 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 977 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.