Plymouth 'Cuda AAR

vs

Dodge Charger

USA vs USA — 1970 vs 1966

Plymouth 'Cuda AAR (1970)
Dodge Charger (1966)
Specifications
'Cuda AAR 340 Six PackCharger Fastback 383
Horsepower290 hp325 hp
Torque345 lb-ft410 lb-ft
Engine Size5,572 cc6,276 cc
0-60 mph5.8 sec6.4 sec
Top Speed125 mph130 mph
¼ Mile14.2 sec14.9 sec
Weight3,300 lbs3,600 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm2,997 mm
Length4,724 mm5,257 mm
Units Produced2,72437,344
Original MSRP$3,635$3,122
Value (Excellent)$350,000$110,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity8/106/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack excels in quicker acceleration, lighter weight, greater rarity, while the 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383 stands out for more power, higher top speed, better value. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Among Muscle Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack and 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383 is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 325 hp compared to 290 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. The Plymouth 'Cuda AAR carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 300 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 2,724 units built, the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack is considerably scarcer than the Dodge Charger's 37,344 examples. On the collector market, the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack commands a significant premium over the 1966 Dodge Charger Fastback 383, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.