Mazda Cosmo

vs

Shelby Cobra 289

Japan vs USA — 1967 vs 1963

Mazda Cosmo (1967)
Shelby Cobra 289 (1963)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110SCobra 289 FIA Roadster
Horsepower110 hp271 hp
Torque310 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc4,727 cc
0-60 mph5.5 sec
Top Speed155 mph
¼ Mile13.2 sec
Weight2,150 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,286 mm
Length4,140 mm3,835 mm
Units Produced343654
Original MSRP$5,995
Value (Excellent)$180,000$2,500,000
Collectibility5/1010/10
Rarity10/109/10
The Verdict

This matchup is remarkably close. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S offers better value, while the 1963 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA Roadster counters with more power, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.

Overview

When Japan engineering meets USA craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S and 1963 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA Roadster embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. The 1963 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA Roadster holds a clear advantage in raw power with 271 hp compared to 110 hp, a 161-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo uses a Rotary (Wankel) displacing 982 cc, while the Shelby Cobra 289 relies on a V8 OHV with 4,727 cc. On the collector market, the 1963 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA Roadster commands a significant premium over the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1963 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA Roadster rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.