Australia vs USA — 1969 vs 1966
| Torana GTR XU-1 | Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 186 hp | 306 hp |
| Torque | 225 lb-ft | 329 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,310 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3 sec | 6.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.8 sec | 14.9 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,850 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,489 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,328 mm | 4,613 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 1,001 |
| Original MSRP | — | $4,547 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $450,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 9/10 |
The 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1969 Holden Torana GTR XU-1 counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1969 Holden Torana GTR XU-1 against the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Australia versus USA. The 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer holds a clear advantage in raw power with 306 hp compared to 186 hp, a 120-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Torana GTR XU-1 uses a Inline-6 OHV 12V displacing 3,310 cc, while the Ford Shelby GT350H relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer edges ahead at 6.6 seconds versus 8.3 seconds. On the collector market, the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer commands a significant premium over the 1969 Holden Torana GTR XU-1, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.