Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1996
| Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 260 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 12.8 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,330 mm |
| Units Produced | 2,500 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $90,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition brings quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A answers with stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1996 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition producing 280 hp and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo DOHC 16V displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.