USA vs USA — 1965 vs 1970
| Mustang Fastback 2+2 | AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 290 hp |
| Torque | 312 lb-ft | 340 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 5,572 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0 sec | 5.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | 125 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.9 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,549 lbs | 3,400 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,613 mm | 4,871 mm |
| Units Produced | 77,179 | 2,724 |
| Original MSRP | $2,589 | $3,563 |
| Value (Excellent) | $60,000 | $180,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Numbers favor the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2 offers lighter weight, better value, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
In the world of Pony Car cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2 versus the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack. Both hail from Muscle era and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. The 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack holds a clear advantage in raw power with 290 hp compared to 225 hp, a 65-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Plymouth AAR 'Cuda relies on a V8 OHV (340 Six Pack) with 5,572 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 8.0 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 851 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 2,724 units built, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack is considerably scarcer than the Ford Mustang's 77,179 examples. On the collector market, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack commands a significant premium over the 1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.