USA vs USA — 1970 vs 2003
| Challenger R/T | Neon SRT-4 ACR | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 375 hp | 230 hp |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 250 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,210 cc | 2,429 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 153 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.7 sec | 13.8 sec |
| Weight | 3,600 lbs | 3,000 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,667 mm |
| Length | 4,902 mm | 4,445 mm |
| Units Produced | 83,032 | 25,000 |
| Original MSRP | $3,266 | $20,995 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 5/10 |
The 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T counters with more power, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T and 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR share a manufacturer in Dodge, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Dodge brand. The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T holds a clear advantage in raw power with 375 hp compared to 230 hp, a 145-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Dodge Challenger uses a V8 OHV (RB big-block) displacing 7,210 cc, while the Dodge Neon SRT-4 relies on a I4 DOHC Turbocharged with 2,429 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR edges ahead at 5.3 seconds versus 5.8 seconds. The Dodge Neon SRT-4 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 600 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T commands a significant premium over the 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.