USA vs Germany — 1962 vs 1960
| Lark Daytona Convertible | 700 Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 40 hp |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft | 41 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 697 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.5 sec | 23.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | 78 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.0 sec | 24.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,049 lbs | 1,411 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,000 mm |
| Length | 4,775 mm | 3,675 mm |
| Units Produced | 3,602 | 188,121 |
| Original MSRP | $2,814 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $35,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1960 BMW 700 Sport brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value BMW heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Putting the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible against the 1960 BMW 700 Sport is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Germany. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible holds a clear advantage in raw power with 225 hp compared to 40 hp, a 185-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Studebaker Lark uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the BMW 700 relies on a Flat-twin 4-stroke with 697 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible edges ahead at 9.5 seconds versus 23.0 seconds. The BMW 700 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1638 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 3,602 units built, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible is considerably scarcer than the BMW 700's 188,121 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.