UK vs UK — 2000 vs 1979
| 340R Standard | Sunbeam Lotus 2.2 16V | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 177 hp | 150 hp |
| Torque | 133 lb-ft | 152 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,796 cc | 2,174 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 6.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 135 mph | 123 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,451 lbs | 2,117 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,300 mm | 2,413 mm |
| Length | 3,617 mm | 3,959 mm |
| Units Produced | 340 | 2,308 |
| Original MSRP | $42,000 | $12,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $120,000 | $90,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
The 2000 Lotus 340R Standard holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1979 Lotus Sunbeam Lotus 2.2 16V brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Lotus heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 2000 Lotus 340R Standard and 1979 Lotus Sunbeam Lotus 2.2 16V share a manufacturer in Lotus, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Lotus brand. The 2000 Lotus 340R Standard holds a clear advantage in raw power with 177 hp compared to 150 hp, a 27-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Lotus 340R uses a Inline-4 DOHC VVTL-i displacing 1,796 cc, while the Lotus Sunbeam Lotus relies on a Inline-4 DOHC with 2,174 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2000 Lotus 340R Standard edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 6.6 seconds. The Lotus 340R carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 666 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 340 units built, the 2000 Lotus 340R Standard is considerably scarcer than the Lotus Sunbeam Lotus's 2,308 examples.