Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

Maserati Bora

Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1973

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
Maserati Bora (1973)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A)Bora 4.9
Horsepower110 hp330 hp
Torque96 lb-ft332 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc4,930 cc
0-60 mph10.2 sec6.5 sec
Top Speed115 mph174 mph
¼ Mile17.5 sec14.8 sec
Weight2,072 lbs3,638 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,600 mm
Length4,140 mm4,330 mm
Units Produced1,519289
Original MSRP$22,500
Value (Excellent)$350,000$280,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) excels in lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 1973 Maserati Bora 4.9 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1973 Maserati Bora 4.9 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Italy. The 1973 Maserati Bora 4.9 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 330 hp compared to 110 hp, a 220-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the Maserati Bora relies on a V8 DOHC with 4,930 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1973 Maserati Bora 4.9 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1566 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 289 units built, the 1973 Maserati Bora 4.9 is considerably scarcer than the Mazda Cosmo Sport's 1,519 examples.