Australia vs USA — 1970 vs 1966
| Nagari 302 V8 | GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp | 306 hp |
| Torque | 290 lb-ft | 329 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,949 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0 sec | 6.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | 127 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 14.7 sec |
| Weight | 2,249 lbs | 2,800 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,413 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,115 mm | 4,613 mm |
| Units Produced | 118 | 1,001 |
| Original MSRP | — | $4,547 |
| Value (Excellent) | $400,000 | $450,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 8/10 |
On balance, the 1970 Bolwell Nagari 302 V8 makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. However, the 1966 Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer counters with more power, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1970 Bolwell Nagari 302 V8 for outright capability, or the 1966 Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer for a more distinctive ownership experience.
The rivalry between Australia and USA automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1970 Bolwell Nagari 302 V8 versus 1966 Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1966 Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer holds a clear advantage in raw power with 306 hp compared to 210 hp, a 96-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Bolwell Nagari uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,949 cc, while the Shelby GT350H relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Bolwell Nagari 302 V8 edges ahead at 6.0 seconds versus 6.6 seconds. The Bolwell Nagari carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 551 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 118 units built, the 1970 Bolwell Nagari 302 V8 is considerably scarcer than the Shelby GT350H's 1,001 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.