France vs France — 1948 vs 1996
| 2CV 6 | Saxo VTS 16V | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 29 hp | 120 hp |
| Torque | 29 lb-ft | 107 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1,587 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 7.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 71 mph | 126 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,235 lbs | 2,061 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm | 2,379 mm |
| Length | 3,830 mm | 3,718 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,114,969 | — |
| Original MSRP | $1,200 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $15,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 6/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1948 Citroen 2CV 6 offers lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V counters with more power, higher top speed, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Citroen stable, the 1948 Citroen 2CV 6 and 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Citroen badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V holds a clear advantage in raw power with 120 hp compared to 29 hp, a 91-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Citroen 2CV uses a Flat-2 Air-Cooled displacing 602 cc, while the Citroen Saxo relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V with 1,587 cc. The 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V claims a higher top speed at 126 mph compared to 71 mph. The Citroen 2CV carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 826 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1948 Citroen 2CV 6 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.