Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 2007
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution X GSR (CZ4A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 291 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 300 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,998 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.4 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 3,395 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,650 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,495 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $35,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $50,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, lighter weight, stronger collectibility. That said, the 2007 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X GSR (CZ4A) brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mitsubishi heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1996 to 2007 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 2007 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X GSR (CZ4A) delivering 291 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V MIVEC Turbocharged with 1,998 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 4.9 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 397 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.