Ford Mustang

vs

Mercury Cougar

USA vs USA β€” 1964 vs 1967

Ford Mustang (1964)
Mercury Cougar (1967)
Specifications
Mustang K-Code Hi-PerformanceCougar GT 390
Horsepower271 hp320 hp
Torque314 lb-ft430 lb-ft
Engine Size4,736 cc6,391 cc
0-60 mph6.5 sec6.5 sec
Top Speed130 mph125 mph
ΒΌ Mile14.8 sec14.8 sec
Weight2,678 lbs3,400 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm2,844 mm
Length4,613 mm4,851 mm
Units Produced7,2737,412
Original MSRP$2,911$3,295
Value (Excellent)$150,000$95,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity8/107/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance excels in higher top speed, lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1967 Mercury Cougar GT 390 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Among Pony Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance and 1967 Mercury Cougar GT 390 is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 1967 Mercury Cougar GT 390 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 320 hp compared to 271 hp, a 49-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV (solid lifter, high-performance) displacing 4,736 cc, while the Mercury Cougar relies on a V8 OHV with 6,391 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1967 Mercury Cougar GT 390 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 722 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.