Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

Lamborghini 400 GT

Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1966

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
Lamborghini 400 GT (1966)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A)400 GT 2+2
Horsepower110 hp320 hp
Torque96 lb-ft268 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc3,929 cc
0-60 mph10.2 sec6.5 sec
Top Speed115 mph168 mph
¼ Mile17.5 sec14.5 sec
Weight2,072 lbs2,822 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,550 mm
Length4,140 mm4,580 mm
Units Produced1,519247
Original MSRP$14,750
Value (Excellent)$350,000$1,000,000
Collectibility9/109/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

Numbers favor the 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) offers lighter weight, better value, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.

Overview

The rivalry between Japan and Italy automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) versus 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 320 hp compared to 110 hp, a 210-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the Lamborghini 400 GT relies on a V12 DOHC with 3,929 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 750 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 247 units built, the 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 is considerably scarcer than the Mazda Cosmo Sport's 1,519 examples. On the collector market, the 1966 Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 commands a significant premium over the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A), reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.