Oldsmobile Cutlass

vs

Ford Falcon

USA vs Australia — 1968 vs 1971

Oldsmobile Cutlass (1968)
Ford Falcon (1971)
Specifications
Cutlass Hurst/OldsFalcon XA GT RPO 83 Hardtop
Horsepower390 hp300 hp
Torque500 lb-ft360 lb-ft
Engine Size7,456 cc5,763 cc
0-60 mph5.9 sec6.8 sec
Top Speed125 mph137 mph
¼ Mile13.9 sec14.6 sec
Weight3,650 lbs
Wheelbase2,845 mm2,819 mm
Length5,156 mm4,880 mm
Units Produced515250
Original MSRP$4,025
Value (Excellent)$200,000$1,200,000
Collectibility9/105/10
Rarity8/1010/10
The Verdict

The 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, stronger collectibility. That said, the 1971 Ford Falcon XA GT RPO 83 Hardtop brings higher top speed, greater rarity and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Ford heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

When USA engineering meets Australia craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds and 1971 Ford Falcon XA GT RPO 83 Hardtop embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. The 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds holds a clear advantage in raw power with 390 hp compared to 300 hp, a 90-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Oldsmobile Cutlass uses a V8 OHV (Oldsmobile 455) displacing 7,456 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,763 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 6.8 seconds. On the collector market, the 1971 Ford Falcon XA GT RPO 83 Hardtop commands a significant premium over the 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass Hurst/Olds rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.