Hudson Commodore

vs

Hudson Hornet

USA vs USA β€” 1951 vs 1953

Hudson Commodore (1951)
Hudson Hornet (1953)
Specifications
Commodore Eight SedanHornet 7-X Racing Engine
Horsepower128 hp210 hp
Torque220 lb-ft290 lb-ft
Engine Size4,194 cc5,047 cc
0-60 mph14.5 sec12.5 sec
Top Speed100 mph110 mph
ΒΌ Mile19.8 sec18.5 sec
Weight3,600 lbs3,600 lbs
Wheelbase3,124 mm3,150 mm
Length5,232 mm5,283 mm
Units Produced35,42143,596
Original MSRP$2,742$2,769
Value (Excellent)$40,000$75,000
Collectibility6/109/10
Rarity6/107/10
The Verdict

The 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1951 Hudson Commodore Eight Sedan counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

The 1951 Hudson Commodore Eight Sedan and 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine share a manufacturer in Hudson, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Hudson brand. The 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine holds a clear advantage in raw power with 210 hp compared to 128 hp, a 82-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Hudson Commodore uses a Inline-8 L-head displacing 4,194 cc, while the Hudson Hornet relies on a Inline-6 L-head (Hudson H-145) with 5,047 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine edges ahead at 12.5 seconds versus 14.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine commands a significant premium over the 1951 Hudson Commodore Eight Sedan, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1953 Hudson Hornet 7-X Racing Engine rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.