USA vs USA — 1974 vs 1962
| Pacer DL | Lark Daytona Convertible | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 120 hp | 225 hp |
| Torque | 210 lb-ft | 280 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,228 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.0 sec | 9.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 95 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.5 sec | 17.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,049 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm | 2,794 mm |
| Length | 4,336 mm | 4,775 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 3,602 |
| Original MSRP | — | $2,814 |
| Value (Excellent) | $18,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 7/10 |
The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1974 AMC Pacer DL counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1974 AMC Pacer DL and 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible stand as two of the most notable Compact cars from Muscle era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible holds a clear advantage in raw power with 225 hp compared to 120 hp, a 105-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the AMC Pacer uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 4,228 cc, while the Studebaker Lark relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible edges ahead at 9.5 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. On the collector market, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible commands a significant premium over the 1974 AMC Pacer DL, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.