Holden 48-215

vs

Holden Ute SS V

Australia vs Australia — 1948 vs 2001

Holden 48-215 (1948)
Holden Ute SS V (2001)
Specifications
48-215 FXUte SS V HSV Maloo R8
Horsepower60 hp457 hp
Torque105 lb-ft420 lb-ft
Engine Size2,171 cc6,162 cc
0-60 mph4.8 sec
Top Speed80 mph155 mph
¼ Mile13.0 sec
Weight2,251 lbs4,001 lbs
Wheelbase2,642 mm3,048 mm
Length4,420 mm5,055 mm
Units Produced120,402
Value (Excellent)$80,000$100,000
Collectibility9/107/10
Rarity7/106/10
The Verdict

It's a closely fought contest. The 1948 Holden 48-215 FX brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 answers with more power, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.

Overview

Holden has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1948 Holden 48-215 FX with the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 457 hp compared to 60 hp, a 397-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden 48-215 uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,171 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 claims a higher top speed at 155 mph compared to 80 mph. The Holden 48-215 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1750 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1948 Holden 48-215 FX rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.