Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 2003
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 3,086 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,490 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $33,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, better value. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1996 to 2003 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V MIVEC Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) edges ahead at 4.3 seconds versus 4.4 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.