France vs France — 1994 vs 2003
| Clio Williams | Clio V6 Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 255 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | — |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 2,946 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | — |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,467 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 3,816 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | 1,309 |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 10/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1994 Renault Clio Williams brings better value to the table, and the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 answers with more power, greater rarity. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Renault Clio Williams. The 1994 and 2003 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 255 hp compared to 150 hp, a 105-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio Williams uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault Clio relies on a V6 with 2,946 cc. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,309 units built, the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 is considerably scarcer than the Renault Clio Williams's 12,100 examples. On the collector market, the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 commands a significant premium over the 1994 Renault Clio Williams, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.